Quantcast
Channel: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal
Browsing all 29 articles
Browse latest View live

1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Based off the latest ‘Showboat’ series. In the recent instalment of ‘Showboat’ the RN is planning to build a class of 6 ‘Improved G3’ type battlecruisers from the late 1930s onwards. I am not totally...

View Article



Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

IIRC There were 6 number twin 13.5" turret asemblies in store at Rosyth as well as the 4 number twin 15" turrets. There was also I believe a considerable quantatie of recovered armour available (even...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

We had some slipway space seems to be the consensus on alt KGVs with old guns / mounts. Four big ships worth, depends, you did say "follow on, so probably doable. Germans had the opposite problem,...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

"I also want to reserve these for railway gun use & possible coastal defences by the RA." What the Trolls wished to convey with the above quote was that the 'big' guns needed to be reserved for...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

How come the US Army was able to do it? There's some extra work beyond just getting some rail guns but it is possible. Standard rail guns may not be able to track moving targets but that's not...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Turn table, if you can compensate for recoil.

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

One method. Recoil isn't that great an issue on most rail guns, they don't roll backwards on firing. All you need is sufficient on carriage elevation and traverse, fast enough to get onto the exact...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

ChrisPat wrote:One method. Recoil isn't that great an issue on most rail guns, they don't roll backwards on firing. All you need is sufficient on carriage elevation and traverse, fast enough to get...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

ede144 wrote:If it's so easy, why is there any railway gun available in any Army? Because it isn't 1938 anymore, back then most armies had them, albeit not for coast defence - that was a US niche.My...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

These would all be 'Spanish' type barbette mounts for the 13.5-inch to defend bases like Singapore, Malta, Gib, Cape Town etc. Railways would only be moved to shift the guns to their positions. Proper...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

1. Modern era - Unless you have air dominance, it's a juicy target; in fact, it could expect to get visited by any number of Scuds and Tomahawks. If collateral damage isn't a factor (rural area or...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Anzio Annie? '44.

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

1. Rail guns of BB caliber have tremendous recoil.  Shoves the mounting car    considerably backwards.  And that is planned into the guns recoil system.2.  No building of aiming turntables.  That's...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

The main strategy behind a railway gun is simply using a means for moving a very large piece of ordnance over strategic distances in order to get it near enough the battlefield to shoot at the enemy....

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Nope. 1. Not with a suitable recoil mechanism, ships don't go sideways, super heavy arty doesn't all move on firing (some did, 7.2" Hows show both). Some rail guns allowed the mount to move, some...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Rail guns allow one gun to cover a length of coast greater than its own range, exceptionally, as at Panama, two coasts. For Britain I can imagine being able to move guns from one end of the Suez...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

The railway could also be used to move troops the entire length of the Suez Canal to defend it from land attacks & general policing duties. I also have visions of 'land' railway guns (up to...

View Article


Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

An article on armoured trains gave me the impression that it might be a rather good concept, especially if the country has an extensive and compact network, even with the dangers of sabotage, missile...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Where 360 degree traverse is useful is a small island like Malta where rail mobility isn't useful. Given somewhere that a longish line can be used a selection of just under 180 degree positions should...

View Article

Re: 1938 British Battlecruiser Proposal

Not quite the large calibre railway guns being discussed here, but the Italian Navy at the start of WWII operated a number of Armoured Trains - 5 armed with 6inch guns, 4 with 4.7inch guns, 1 with...

View Article
Browsing all 29 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images